Extracts of the Report on McDonald's Toy Contractors in China
Hong Kong Christian Industrial Committee
The Hong Kong Christian Industrial Committee (CIC) has visited a total of 10 factories, all of which are toy contractors for McDonald's in main land China, from August to October 2000. Earlier on (27 Aug 2000), we published an in-depth report on the conditions in City Toys, another toy contractor for McDonald's in Shenzhen. The City Toys reports reveals gross violations of labor rights, the use of under aged labor, and the total failure of McDonald' factory monitoring in addressing and correcting these violations.
The aim of our conducting these factories visits of McDonald's toy contractors is to let the local as well as the international communities know what lies behind the fun and "Smiles" of McDonald's toys.
The spear of McDonald's marketing strategy in the last ten years is combining fast food and toys, using toys to boast both its public image and sales globally. Developing strategic business partnerships with other entertainment giants like Warner Brothers, Disney and Habro, McDonald's is selling billions of licensed toys all over the world. Plastic Barbies and plush teddy bears created big hits in the US. Youngsters in HK, Taiwan, Singapore queued overnight for plastic Snoopy and plush Hello Kitty. In 1997, the corporation spent RMB1 billion (USD120.9mn) in domestic procurement in China which included the purchase of 1.3 billion toys manufactured mainly in South China.
McDonald's is purchasing toys in China mainly through its marketing partner, Simon Marketing (a subsidiary of Cykr, a Nasdaq listed company). Contracting both sourcing and manufacturing to others gives the corporation ample room to dissociate itself from accusations of environmental and labor exploitation. All the wrongs done to the environment and the workers are "contractor's faults", McDonald's can still claim to have a whole set of labor codes and a clean conscience. Contracts with black sheep toy contractors like City Toys can be easily cut and have business shifted to other "cleaner" contractors.
The City Toys case (of using child labor and violating labor rights and finally have all contracts cut by McDonald's and many workers laid off) is a good illustration of how the corporation cares only for its good name but not the welfare of workers laboring for it. The case also demonstrates how the internal labor rights monitoring of the corporation, which the corporation claims to be credible and reliable, is nothing but a sham. Not only are the labor rights violations not corrected, they are not even revealed or addressed.
City Toys is not an isolated example. Of the ten McDonald's toy contractors we've visited, all of them violate Chinese Labor Law.
We conduct this factory research only to communicate one message to the corporation and the public. The above violations are not violations of particular contractors only. McDonald's definitely has liability for the workers of its contractors.
To quote from the words of a coloring worker in one of the above factories, "The toys we make worth less than a penny. I've never got more than RMB0.1 from any piece of toy I made for McDonald's. Our boss came all the way to invest here because we are cheap. What we see as staged everyday in the factory is exactly the exploitation of the surplus labor of workers."
If McDonald's does not PAY to measure up to its claims for labor rights protection, the global community will understand from now on what lies behind the big smile is nothing but falsity and exploitation.
We strongly demand McDonald's to :
HKCIC would strongly reiterates its concern and warning to McDonald's :
HKCIC releases the factories findings in the hope to improve the conditions of McDonald's toy workers in China. McDonald's should see to it that none of the toy workers in the above mentioned factories would be penalized, retaliated or arbitrarily dismissed because of this.
15 October 2000
(The full report will be officially released in two weeks’ time)
something to say about opposition and resistance to McDonald's?
The Campaigns section of the Debating Room is for you.