Day 174 - 17 Oct 95 - Page 03
1 strike and he came back to work.
3 Q. Did he not have a Rights Commissioner hearing?
4 A. Not that I can recall.
6 Q. You do not remember one?
7 A. No.
9 Q. Do you remember some controversy about Mr. Caulfield
10 complaining that his job status had been reduced?
11 A. Not in particular, no. His job, from what I can
12 remember of it, was that he did maintenance work in the
15 Q. What was his position when he came back?
16 A. I presume he was the same position.
18 Q. But you do not remember?
19 A. I do not remember, no.
21 Q. Do you have any documents concerning Anne Holmes'
22 complaints to the Rights Commissioner?
23 A. No, not to my knowledge. The only documents we have
24 are the ones that we have produced to the solicitor.
26 Q. Why would you have thrown away the documents relating to a
27 successful application to the Rights Commissioner by
28 Miss Holmes, when you kept the ones relating to Mr. Macken?
29 A. I cannot say.
31 Q. I also wanted to ask you about -- I do not know whether you
32 have pink volume XIII B there, please. If you could turn
33 to page -- it is in tab 59, page 1023.
34 A. Yes, I have it.
36 Q. This is the granting of an injunction, I think. Well,
37 I think the first one is an interim injunction. In the
38 second paragraph, the court refers to having read the
39 affidavits of Cerine Brennan, Michael Burn, Peter Lawler,
40 and then James Macken, Sean Mrozek, Noel Dowling and Thomas
41 White "filed respectively this day". Did you keep those
43 A. I cannot -----
45 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Did you have them, yourself?
46 A. The affidavits of these people you mentioned?
48 Q. Yes.
49 A. I cannot recall. My files would have consisted of
50 whatever we had. Whether I had seen them or not, at this
51 point in time I cannot recollect.
53 MS. STEEL: It would have been normal practice, would it not,
54 for you to have seen the affidavits to comment on them, if
55 your solicitors wanted to rebut what they said in court, or
56 anything like that?
57 A. Yes, I believe so.
59 Q. So they would have provided you with copies of them?
60 A. I presume they would have, yes.