Day 259 - 10 Jun 96 - Page 04


     
     1        them ---
     2        A.  Yes.
     3
     4   Q.   -- some time before?
     5        A.  Yes, yes.  I saw the photographs within two or three
     6        days of the demonstration, because I sent them to the
     7        agencies.
     8
     9   Q.   You would have seen them since then as well, you know,
    10        during the court case when Mr. Rampton referred to them in
    11        opening speech, and so on?
    12        A.  Yes.
    13
    14   Q.   You said that you were interviewed by Mrs. Brinley-Codd the
    15        day after, or you spoke to Mrs. Brinley-Codd the day after
    16        the picket in 1989, and that at that stage there was no
    17        plan to go to court; it was a possibility?
    18        A.  It was the logical end of the sequence.  If you did not
    19        withdraw the leaflet and if we went to court and you did
    20        not apologise, then the next stage would be a trial.  But
    21        we did not think it would reach that far at that time.
    22
    23   Q.   So, at that stage, you were actually intending to serve
    24        writs?
    25        A.  No, no.  At that time, I was quite happy, had we been
    26        able to just write to you and say, "Look, this is wrong.
    27        Stop distributing it, and that is the end of the matter";
    28        but as the inquiry continued, it became evident to our
    29        solicitors and to the counsel then advising us that that
    30        kind of approach would be inappropriate.  So that was when
    31        they decided to go for writ; and that was after we had
    32        received almost all of the evidence from the agencies.
    33
    34   Q.   Anyway, you said that because it was not a definite thing
    35        that litigation was going ahead, there was no proof of
    36        evidence taken in 1989, and it was taken in 1990.  That is
    37        what you said on a previous occasion?
    38        A.  Yes.
    39
    40   Q.   So, what happened was that you went in in 1990 and
    41        explained what had happened on the picket; notes were taken
    42        and a statement was drawn up from that?
    43        A.  That is right.
    44
    45   Q.   Right.
    46        A.  I mean, Mrs. Brinley-Codd took notes from me the next
    47        day, but not, as far as I am concerned, as a preparation to
    48        preparing a statement.  That was done in 1990.
    49
    50   Q.   So, she did not just draw up a statement from the notes 
    51        that she had taken on in 1989 and not bother to speak to 
    52        you again before then? 
    53        A.  No.  I am pretty sure we had another meeting.  We
    54        talked about it on several occasions.
    55
    56   Q.   There were some details wrong in this first statement,
    57        i.e., that there was no picket in 1986 and 1985?
    58        A.  Yes.  That was a misinterpretation of what I said.
    59
    60   Q.   So, is the position that you signed a statement without

Prev Next Index