- Anything Else -

End the Suffering!

Posted by: Aomi ( USA ) on May 06, 1999 at 10:27:29:

Why doesn't Procter & Gamble seem to realize that there are alternatives to animal testing? They just aren't open to exploring alternatives, and think that animal testing is the only way to test products. Human cell cultures have been used in eye irritancy tests, and are more reliable and cost-effective than Draize tests. Also, there are over 600 other companies that are against animal testing and have found alternatives. You would think Procter & Gamble would at least be open to trying alternatives.

--
McSpotlight: Moved from the Multinationals room.


Follow Ups:

None.

The Debating Room Post a Followup