Huh? The point is that something that is prevalent in nature is justified? Many types of mammals eat their children - chimps and lions are notable examples. I hope this doesn't make you into a 'post-birth' abortion advocate.(What an issue for a scientific journal to delve into! Any fool observing the behavior of dogs knows that all sorts of conduct are 'common' in nature ... thus, the term 'behaving like animals')
The point is that my attitude towards homosexual behavior (a mild disgust, a civilized tolerance) is in no way connected to the prevalence of said behavior in nature (indeed ... I am no more partial to the practice in the canine than when observed amongst the sapien). Only a committed 'Green' could see any connection between the two in this essentially spurious and pointless argument.
There is no need for Mr. Gort to dance. The 'music' is nothing of the sort; I see nothing for him to dance to. Enough of this, you two.
"Doc" Cruel
P.S. Let one Mr. Harlon Ellison have the last word, when he remarked that God, as he envisioned him, was a sadist possessed of rather a sick and twisted sense of humor. Reason enough I suppose to engage in his own unique style of prose; thus, to aspire to the divine ...
