: The burden of prof is with the Christian to prove what he beleives. If he beleives in God then he must prove it. A religious person can never ask his non beleiving freind to prove that God doesn't exist. It is imposible. Science can never prove non-existance. Therefore the burden is the with the person with something to prove.Why is it with us, I mean me, why should I prove anything? If science is on your side it shouldnt be a problem right?
:As a Christian I can not ask anyone to prove their beliefs if they rest in the non-existance of elements of my beliefs.
Why cant I? I'm doing it now?
:I must prove they exist.
Why?
: Furthermore how can there be evidence for the non-existance of God. The basis of the whole argument is that there is NO EVIDENCE. I must start at a place that all me agree with, such as reason and logic, and then through argument draw a picture of and prove a beliefe.
Really? Well athieism surely has some grounding such as darwinism etc. which has to be proven, if it is an empty criticism of christianity it isnt a belief it's a heresy.
: I have gone into the idea of reason and logic as being more important than saying, "Because the Bible says so," in detail in the message entitled "Re: Burning people at the stake is synonymous with 'truth'?" This is posted under "Christianity is not Religion, for DDN" by Ryan Close on September 20, 1999.
Fine, I'll check it out.
: Meanwhile, remember that atheists are in the clear.
In the clear for what?
