- Campaigns -
a little cautious
Posted by: lu-lu ( us ) on January 28, 1999 at 11:47:39:
if "what's wrong with mcdonalds" isn't legally sound right now, why endanger the freedom of others by suggesting that they distribute copies? also, what's wrong with burger king, or wendy's or whatever else there is in the u.k.? it's fair to wonder if your propaganda is paid for by a rival chain. even more believable is the notion that perhaps there are enough overzealous slaughterhouse-bombing vegans in the world with an itch to soil mcdonalds' reputation to go to all this trouble. now, i want to believe this, but i'm not exactly following the trail of the truth... it gets a little sketchy. maybe mcdonalds u.k. can be accused of everything in "what's wrong with mcdonalds", but what about in the states? it's just not clear enough. give me proof and i'll give 'em hell... until then, i will not risk a libel suit. please reply.--
McSpotlight: See the followup.
Follow Ups:
|