: : See, name calling is not a constructive method of discussion.
: No, but it is amusing, buttercup.
It can be, thats why we all like to return to it.
: Not if rents are that high across teh market, the only limit to rent being the ability of people to pay (and even if some can't, there's always a plantiful supply of cardboard boxes).
And vastly reduced potential earnings for the landlords, who could fill those empty capital draining homes with rent payers.
: Statism grows around impoverishment as well.
Nothing like an angry mob getting together to 'get what he's got' - I wonder what it doesnt grow around?
: Erm, no, In England it meant using teh state to make teh workers do what the newly rising Middle-Class wanted, those bastions of laissez Faire hypocrisy.
Thats what I said, not leave it alone, but mess-about hypocracy.
: How so, if we all work directly, and democratically, and use our means of production to our common will, then where is teh need for a state- equality of wealth would eliminate property crime, no state is needed to regulate currency, or police borders...
If, being the word SDF calls you a dreamer for.
Like I might say 'if people associated freely valuing eachother....'