: Your response didn't even interest me in the subjectDo you imagine I find it important to interest you?
: SDF: Even the folks supporting your anti-anti-trust opinions will argue that there was and is a wide disparity of opinion about the anti-trust laws, then as now.
Wide disparities of opinion are simply wide disparities of opinion.
: SDF: And neither does ad hominem characterizations of the various arguments.
Im beginning to understand why Joel claims you dont follow discussions. I sometimes wonder if you have read what I have written instead of read your agenda into what I have written.
: SDF: How do you know it's not you who's pretending? Or do you like to pretend you've won arguments all the time? The issue IS still up in the air -- try presenting some more evidence or something with a shred of credibility.
You simply rubbish anything wich is what you call right wing, without regard to its content. You have done this before, presenting you with links to anything at policy.com or cato meets with the same bland response
: since "rights" are meaningless in the individualist universe Gee lives in, without a social authority to establish them.
individual rights are meanignless without the right to idndividual property.
: Property is still theft. My argument still stands unscathed by Gee's meaningless utopianizing against "force". I await the disappearance of racism, exploitation, and nations when Gee says they're "wrong."
And they await your anti-midas touch of interference.
None.
