: : A different take and some answers.
: You people think the view that you can be free and miserable is great, that a man if he starves but is not interfered with by state is still free, even if it is the interference of powerful and malignant others that has led to his condition.
: That is heartless not to mention a complete betrayal of principled freedom and liberty.
The principled freedom and liberty to take what you want from
anyone, no matter his objections?
You are then infringing on his liberty.
Is this what you mean by *principled*?