- Capitalism and Alternatives -

Schmoover!

In Reply to: Hoover! posted by Red Deathy on May 05, 1999 at 15:38:05:

: Not good enough, finite owners mean that some can't be owners, we have to universalise ownership.

Also not good enough. The above require some people to lose their property? How, Who, Why and what happens if they disagree?

: But the whole point is it can't bve, because of market saturation and a declining rate of profit, such money is ploughed back into land, stocks or curency, to try and make another big windfall. they've got money they can't use, so they gamble with it.

A misunderstanding of the stock market. Its there to raise capital for fruitfall wealth cretion endeavours. Gambling doesnt pay.

: Billions can disappear that way, it is damaging.

More billions are made every year. Made.

: The graph I'm thinking of starts in the 1950's and runs to 1990-ish...

Show it

Follow Ups:

• Doozers V.Fraggles. Red Deathy Socialist party UK May 05 1999 (3)
  • you watched that? Gee si May 05 1999 (2)
    • Why Aye man? Red Deathy Socilaist Party Uk May 06 1999 (1)
      • fraggle rock Gee May 06 1999 (0)
• A few uninformed questions Gideon Hallett UK May 05 1999 (1)
  • answering Gee si May 05 1999 (2)
    • Why Aye man? Red Deathy Socilaist Party Uk May 06 1999 (1)
      • fraggle rock Gee May 06 1999 (0)