- Capitalism and Alternatives -

Right wing vs. capitalist

Posted by: Ludwig von Mises ( USA ) on June 09, 1999 at 10:49:19:

In Reply to: Cuba and America posted by Nikhil Jaikumar on June 01, 1999 at 10:15:46:

: : If Cuba isn't a dictatorship, why did they have the support of the dictators?

: That doesn't amke any sense. Which dictators are you talking about? The Soviets? First of all, the post-Stalin USSR was a party-state, nota dictatorship. Secondly, Cuba also had the support of the world's largest liberal democracy (India). Does that make it a liberal democracy according to your logic?

C'mon. The Cuban military was the USSR's right hand. They supplied them, they sent them throughout the world to fight for them, and they put nuclear missiles on their land.

: : Uhh, huh. They like it so much that they make little rafts to escape and the Cuban military forces them to stay in the country. That's real love, man.

: 1) what percentage of the Cuban people attempt to escape? Something miniscule I would think. This is purely anecdotal. In any system you're going to have people who don't fit in. But there are less of those in Cuba than in other countries. In general, socialist societies have done away with alienation.

Think Berlin wall. Think 38th paralel. People couldn't leave for better countries most of the time, and where they could they were stopped with brutality. Think about it: you live in N Korea and want out. You can't get to South Korea, China and Russia are both communist, and it would be near impossible to get to Japan. You live at any point in China and want out. Even if you could cross the mountains in the west, you're boardered by the USSR, two poor and undeveloped mountain countries, two poor varied countries, and a country that is constantly under attack by one of these countries. It is still nearly impossible to reach Japan, Taiwan is no good and even if it is China could take it out with the push of a button, Philippines are poor and overpopulated, Burma is poor and undeveloped, Indochina is prety much run by China, and Hong Kong only has a short period of time before it is under Chinese control, if you could get there.

Turning to eastern Europe: If you're in the USSR you have no hope: Poland is communist, the balkans are communist, Czeckeslovakia is communist, Hungary is communist, and to the south you have undesireable Turkey and a country run by Islamic fanatics. In Polan you're surrounded, in Hungary you'd have to cross mountains, in the Balkans you have to cross mountains, West Germany is very hard to reach and Finland is across almost artic terrain. You're bassically trapped if you'r ein a communist nation.

Back to Cuba, if hardly anyone wants to leave, why does the military prevent them from leaving?

: 2) the reaosn why the US takes more Cuban refugees is because it ahs a policy of favoring people escapingfrom communsit countries. The Guatemalans, who were in danger of being amssacred in their own country, were summarily turned away at the door. The right-wing dictatorships of Latin America produced more refugees than Cuba, but these refugees were turned away by America.

As are some Cuban refugees. The US immigration laws foolishly disallow very many refugees enter the country.

: 3) how many of these 'refugees" are leaving for political reasons, and how many of them just can't stand living in a society where they are equal to everyone elze, rich, poor, white and black?

If everyone is equal and most everyone is poor, everyone is poor. Being forced in to poverty would tend to make people leave. Besides, if someone doesn't want that crap, why force them to stay?

: 4) you haven't even addressd my substantive point- if they were dissatisfied, mroe of tehm would turn in spoiled ballots.

Spoiled ballots like voting for Daffy Duck? When you're voting for the one guy running, you wouldn't neccissarily think to turn in a spoiled ballot.

: : : 3) Cuba has a measure of participatory democracy in that people's input is tken into account in making decisions.

: : In what way does peoples input count?

: Cuba has a degree of participatory democracy. The people elect candidates to the national assembly, and also control economic decisions through their presenbce on decision-making councils.

How much power do these councils have over the dictator? As much power as the house has over the President, or as much power as FDIC has over the CIA?

: : : 4)Cuba's free speech record has markedly improved in recent years, revisionist communsim is now legal over there.

: : Uhh, OK.

: Is this a response?

Fine, I'll respond. Why don't they allow free speech? Are they afraid of the truth and that the people will learn the truth?

: : : 5) Cuba has never had death squads, genocide, etc. unliek otehr Latin American countries.

: : THa's cause it's a small, isolated country. Not too many different groups inhabit Cuba, and it is not nationalist.

: 1) Cuba is neither small nor isolated. It has more people than Somoza's Nicaragua or Rios' Guatemalla, both of which carried out repression or genocide. It has more people than Uruguay, which was at one point possibly the most repressive country in the world.

How many different ethnic backgrounds are there in Cuba? Have their ancestors been killing eachother off for no appearent reason for hundreds of years? Is their leader nationalist?

It has to have a few of those to commit genocide.

: 2) Cuba is possibly the least isolated country in the world. more Cuban volunteers serve overseas than almsot any other country. Cuba sends doctors to South Africa, and has volunteered in the past to send medical relief to the deprived people of Harlem.

We should let them into Harlem. They are isolated from the western world(ie NATO), and this is one of the west's mistakes in dealing with them. We keep them locked off from other ideas, which makes them less likely to revolt.

: : : 6) On the question of libertarianism, did you knoa that Cuba has no laws agaisnt homosexuality, whereas many American states do?

: : What laws against gays? In the US, gays arfe generally more protected than regular people.

: you evidently are not familiar with the anti-sodomy statutes that are on the books in many states? In Bowers vs. Hardwick (mid-80s) the Supreme Court ruled thet Georgia had the right to ban gay sex. My home state of Massachusetts forbids fornication, either hetero- or homosexual. I think oral sex and/or fornication are also illegal in about a dozen states.
: Cuba's laws say taht homosexuality is just as natural as heterosexuality. Can you seriously imagine ANY American state government conceding that? I think not.

No, I couldn't. I'm in agreement with you that consentual crimes are a load of crap. However, I would be suprised if Cuba doesn't have at least some laws like that.

: : : 7) Castro has killed an absolute MAXIMUM of 12,000 people in 40 years, while his right-wing predecessor killed 20,000 in seven years.

: : Right wing, yes. Capitalist, no.

: He was capitalist in the same sense that Stalin was a communist. He was capitalist in the sense that he served teh interests of the US business class. Why else do you think the US continues its shameful embargo on Cuba?

The US is not capitalist. The Right Wing is generally nationalist, crazed, and allied with a super power. Capitalism stays isolated to a certain extent.

Follow Ups:

The Debating Room Post a Followup