- Capitalism and Alternatives -

Socialism should be a very deliberate political minarchism

Posted by: Lark on September 01, 1999 at 15:11:25:

In Reply to: Youre much clearer posted by Gee on August 25, 1999 at 19:32:36:

: : Well, its an anrachist model that would say the state could end tommorrow, the difference between Anarchists and socialists is that we say you'd have to build the right conditions in which hoarding would end- eitehr through temporary rationing, or a production spike to cover for the inital glut. People, having pratical consciousness, and having deliberately aimed at socialiation of property, would learn the values from there. to demand an abstract change of mind-set a priori is idealist.

: Fatal aswell. I would suggest rationing would be resisted and attempts as spiking would require a mass of productive free trade. Any changes would occur after a great majority had changed their minds, not be stimulated by changes to the current set up.

Lark: Yes, social engineering, especially that undertaken by institutes or coercive measure is like war it's seldom finished by the same people who start it.

Socialism should be a very deliberate political minarchism, then the individual has greater freedom to either opt for a region like Gees, RD's or mine.

Follow Ups:


The Debating Room Post a Followup