- Capitalism and Alternatives -

sillies.

Posted by: Gee ( si ) on October 27, 1999 at 18:13:48:

In Reply to: 'Real terms' posted by Stoller on October 27, 1999 at 16:59:55:


:
: : : Nice to see such a thoughtful post from you for once.

: : Well, though wrapped in condescending arrogence, thats pleasant of you...

: Who's being arrogant?

You states 'nice to see such a thoughtful post from you' - thats the pleasant part. "for once." may just be your opinion - suggesting that you in particular thought the others posts were thoughtless. Maybe I am reading tone into your words, accurately I imagine.

: Funny---you just said in this post: 'The best way to get a perception is to compare a similar study from, say the 50's, with one now and see how people rate their quality of of life.'

Precisely - how to overcome the changing 'value' of the work 'happy'

: Would you have 'happiness' atomized into vaious commodities?---i.e. does an iMac in 1998 makes me happier than a Quad stereo 'system' did in 1969?

Thats the question.

: That would be silly.

Can you explain why it must be silly? I'm not saying that it isnt silly - but can you explain why, given a theoretical constant rate of objective happiness (ie not the subjective valuation offered in surveys), a person 100 years ago claiming to be happy is as happy, mre or less happy, than a person claiming the same now?

Perhaps the silliness is, after all, in comparing surveys. hmmm...



Follow Ups:

The Debating Room Post a Followup