: : SDF: I myself have an anecdote to share.
: : This was Frenchy's response when I basically accused him of being a sucker.
: As a socialist, I hate to say this but this debate board is living proof that water seeks the lowest level.
: Sam: instead of responding to this post, this post, or this post, you've shown that you'd rather play BZZZT with some hopeless reactionary for easy ha-ha's.
SDF: That's because in those posts you're repeating a logical fallacy. Just because Twin Oaks is integrated into capitalism and is (by you) considered a "successful" commune does not mean there CANNOT be a "successful" commune that IS NOT integrated into capitalism. To show the latter requires a different argument than the ones you've given in all those posts. I've already spelled this out. Since you're wetting your pants at Gee for not recognizing stuff you've spent so many labor-hours to explain, what do you expect from me? Love and kisses?
Go away, Stoller. Crybabies can take their marbles and go home for all I care. I don't find your posts reinforcing anymore.