In Reply to: Why attack McDonalds posted by Elizabeth Chamberlain on November 29, 1996 at 18:43:05:
> The question is not Why, but WHY NOT?
> Freedom of speach. That's why not.
Surely freedom of speech gives us the right to challenge the ethics
of such an organisation in any way we see fit.
I think that McDonalds are already regretting the UK court action
and the publicity it has brought them.