- McLibel -

Re: Why attack McDonalds

Posted by: Simon Jones ( UK ) on December 14, 1996 at 18:59:56:

In Reply to: Why attack McDonalds posted by Elizabeth Chamberlain on November 29, 1996 at 18:43:05:

> The question is not Why, but WHY NOT?

> Freedom of speach. That's why not.

Surely freedom of speech gives us the right to challenge the ethics
of such an organisation in any way we see fit.

I think that McDonalds are already regretting the UK court action
and the publicity it has brought them.

Follow Ups:


The Debating Room Post a Followup