I have been reading up on this case of late via your web page and a few others. The issues seem
quite clear to me, and I am very much opposed to McDonald's.
I have a question pertaining to the Defense's intended line of questioning concerning McD's
destruction of rainforests. The evidence that Steel & Morris present for this issue indicate a lot of
offenses committed in the early 80's. I am just curious - and perhaps I missed this somewhere -
what they will do to show that McDonald's continues to practice such outrageous "agriculture."
Does anyone know what evidence or witness they intend to present?