- Anything Else -

Deconstructing Squares.

Posted by: MDG on February 16, 19100 at 10:19:18:

In Reply to: Right here, next to my heart. posted by Farinata on February 15, 19100 at 18:40:20:

: There could be a five-sided square. I've never seen one; and according to my understanding they don't exist; but I'm not the ultimate authority. Sorry, Stuart, I thought I'd made myself pretty clear there.

: I can never say 'there are no five-sided squares' without invoking synthetic a priori assumptions or definitions (i.e. what the definition of a 'square' is.)

Good grief Farinata, sometimes I think you scientists deconstruct too much for your own good! What is the definition of a square? A rectangle with all four sides equal. Who created this definition? People did! There can be no five-sided squares yet undiscovered because by man-made definition they would no longer be squares! Could there be semolina spaghetti made from spam? Could there be a toaster which makes bread soggy, not crisp? Allow humanity the luxury of defining things and abiding by those definitions; it's one thing to be a skeptic, but quite another to be a naysayer for the sake of naying itself. ("Naying." (v) To say nay).


Follow Ups:

The Debating Room Post a Followup