Day 067 - 15 Dec 94 - Page 10


     
     1   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Could you just pause there a moment?  I would
     2        like to find out just a bit more about what the Humane
     3        Slaughter Act involves, if that is, essentially, what your
     4        specification is because you do not actually have a written
     5        animal specification which is the written McDonald's
     6        specification; do you understand?
     7        A.  That is correct.
     8
     9   Q.   Does the Humane Slaughter Act just have some general
    10        provision that animals are to be treated humanely, and then
    11        the appropriate arm of the administration issue guidelines
    12        as to the way that it is expected that the Humane Slaughter
    13        Act will be enforced, or something else?
    14        A.  There is a book, a big book, that includes the Humane
    15        Slaughter Act, but if I could summarise the concept or the
    16        intent of it, it would be very similar to what you have
    17        here as the code of practice where the intent of it is the
    18        welfare of the animal.  By that it implies that the animal,
    19        that reasonable care should be taken to ensure that the
    20        animal does not suffer from hunger, from thirst, that it is
    21        not subjected to fear, that it will be treated if it shows
    22        signs of disease, and that it will have an opportunity to
    23        express their normal behaviour.  That is the intent of the
    24        Humane Slaughter Act.
    25
    26   Q.   Does the Humane Slaughter Act actually have a provision in
    27        it to that sort of effect?
    28        A.  Yes, and that is very -- it is very, very subjective
    29        and for that reason it is subject to interpretation.
    30
    31   Q.   That is why they have a code of practice, do they, which
    32        goes into more detail?
    33        A.  To some degree, there are -- some times there are
    34        specific -- there are sometimes specific practices that
    35        should be followed, that have -- for example, we talked
    36        yesterday about the stunning of chickens, that they have to
    37        come back to consciousness within a minute, that is
    38        specific.  Most of the content of the Humane Slaughter Act
    39        is not like that and it cannot be like that because the
    40        intent is not to focus on any specific moment in times.
    41        The intent of it is to concentrate on the welfare of the
    42        animal from the time it is born to the time it is
    43        slaughtered.
    44
    45        I could give you an example that I went through:  In fact,
    46        today, I come from a different country, for me to stand in
    47        an unusual environment like this one, it is stressful
    48        because I am not familiar with the court or the court
    49        proceedings.  I never testified before.  I come from a
    50        different time zone ----- 
    51 
    52   Q.   Yes, I understand that, but what would be the equivalent 
    53        provision, if any, in either the Humane Slaughter Act or
    54        some code of practice issued under the umbrella of the
    55        Humane Slaughter Act with regard to animals not being put
    56        to unusual or undue stress?
    57        A.  It does not specify, it does (sic) specify that they
    58        have access to water.  In this particular case I am not
    59        familiar with the amount of time that it takes from the,
    60        that the animal arrives at the slaughterhouse and the time

Prev Next Index