Day 067 - 15 Dec 94 - Page 12


     
     1        been negligence on your part, on the human part, that is
     2        when the law takes into effect.
     3
     4   Q.   If, for example, animals reared for McDonald's were being
     5        kept at greater than the recommended stocking densities,
     6        you would not terminate a supplier for that unless you
     7        could see that they were visibly suffering?
     8        A.  Not necessarily.  The stocking densities again are
     9        guidelines.  What we look for is that animal, or the first
    10        thing, have we done everything, have we done what is
    11        reasonable in terms of providing care in management to that
    12        animal?  Does that animal show significant stress to the
    13        point where you feel it is obvious?  That is what we look
    14        for.
    15
    16        The over-stocking is just a very small factor that will
    17        determine the welfare of an animal.  We do not make
    18        decisions on one minute or two minute span on the lifetime
    19        of an animal.  We take an approach that we should consider
    20        the whole life-span of the animal.  If they are
    21        over-stocked for one or two days, that does not mean that
    22        the animal has been subjected to unreasonable stress and we
    23        take that approach.
    24
    25   Q.   If the animals were over-stocked for a week or two weeks,
    26        would that be contrary to your specifications?
    27        A.  No.  Let me see if I can clarify this question again.
    28        Over-stocking, I do not know what degree of over-stocking
    29        you mean, if you only mean one per cent.  If it means
    30        over-stocking at 10 times the recommended guidelines, we
    31        would reach a totally different conclusion.  We do not look
    32        at every possible guideline that there is.
    33
    34        McDonald's cares about the welfare of the animal.  We look
    35        at the animal and ask ourselves have we provided care to
    36        that animal?  Have we managed the environment for the
    37        animal to grow and be healthier?  That is what we look
    38        for.  We do not look at, is it over-stock?  The animal
    39        could be perfectly healthy, it could be perfectly well, if
    40        it is over-stocked.  We look at the overall environment in
    41        which the animal lives and the effects of that environment
    42        in the animal.  The animal will tell you if he has been
    43        treated properly.  The animal will tell you if we have
    44        provided adequate care -- and McDonald's cares ---
    45
    46   Q.   How will he tell you?
    47        A.  -- about the welfare of animals.
    48
    49   Q.   How will it tell you?
    50        A.  You can look at the feathers; you can look at the eyes 
    51        of the birds; you can look at the gained weight of the 
    52        animals.  If an animal that is not well treated would not 
    53        gain weight, will become sicker than an animal that is
    54        normal.  It will just show.  When you see a sick animal,
    55        you will see it, just like when you see a person that is
    56        sick, a human person that is sick, that is suffering from a
    57        cold, from a headache, he shows signs.  You can see their
    58        expressions.  You can see it in a dog, you can see the
    59        shineness of the hair on a dog; it is the same thing with
    60        animals.

Prev Next Index