Day 145 - 29 Jun 95 - Page 38
1 they are for a specific period, otherwise they are free to
2 leave any time they want, and I think we have talked about
3 the McDonald's, none of us have written contracts.
4
5 Q. So the at will provision of a contract extended the power
6 of management but not of employees?
7 A. No, what it did was it really restored an ability that
8 previously existed.
9
10 Q. It extended following what you say happened some time 12
11 years ago when courts began to protect -----
12
13 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Before the courts, the rulings which were
14 contemplated, could an employer terminate an employee's
15 contract for just cause?
16 A. Yes, they could, my Lord.
17
18 Q. Could they terminate flat an employee's contract just by
19 saying: "I do not want you working for me any longer"?
20 A. That would be very difficult because you would have to
21 prove just cause, challenge.
22
23 Q. You would have to prove just cause before?
24 A. Yes.
25
26 Q. When these rulings came in, as I understand it ---
27 A. You still have to prove just cause.
28
29 Q. -- yes, so in what way did the employee receive more
30 rights?
31 A. He received more rights because it would be implied
32 that there was a life long agreement -- I understand the
33 confusion now -- that there would be a life long agreement
34 absent of just cause or anything else. The allegations
35 were: "You can work for me for ever" kind of thing, and
36 then suddenly there is some justification for economic or
37 otherwise and the employee would say: "Well, I do not care
38 there is economic justification or other justification,
39 I was told that I could remain here my entire life". The
40 courts would then say that you guaranteed this person
41 lifetime employment, so that even if you had good reason,
42 if you will, under normal circumstances, you cannot do it.
43
44 Q. Can I make sure I understand? Before the rulings which you
45 are talking about, an employer could terminate an
46 employee's contract for just cause which might either
47 relate to the employee's behaviour or the employer's
48 circumstances?
49 A. Correct.
50
51 Q. Financial reasons?
52 A. Correct.
53
54 Q. After the ruling came in, you could still terminate an
55 employee's employment for just cause relating to the
56 employee's poor, bad behaviour, if such it was?
57 A. Yes.
58
59 Q. But you could not terminate it for a cause relating to the
60 employer's circumstances?
