Day 214 - 01 02 96 - Page 41


 
 

                                                                  DAY 214
 
                                           DAVID ROBERTS, Cross-examined:
 
 
 
     1        them to work past 12.00 midnight.  If you have
     2        understaffing in a particular restaurant as well, or in the
     3        system generally, you have an even greater tendency for
     4        that to happen; plus, in the latter situation, everyone has
     5        to work very hard.
     6
     7        If you do have under-18s working past 12.00, since that was
     8        against the law up to 1989 to 1990 and was against Company
     9        policy thereafter, you can have a tendency to clock, just
    10        to summarise it in that way.  What you have to do is make
    11        an assessment. "If that is, basically, my case in this; do
    12        I have enough material to press this home to the judge,
    13        anticipate a bit what Mr. Rampton might ask on the other
    14        side, and to what extent does one need to go into detailed
    15        figures", if you think you have material to support the
    16        broad thrust of your argument.  I am not going to stop you
    17        because Mr. Rampton has gone into some of the sheets but it
    18        deserves a bit of thought, I would suggest.
    19
    20   MS. STEEL:  I think the main thing is really, you know, we are
    21        not here trying to defend John Nevison.  I do not have a
    22        clue what he is like, but it just seems that the Plaintiffs
    23        are trying to scape goat him in saying:  "There is not a
    24        problem with the Company, there is a problem with" ------
    25
    26   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What you are trying to do is avoid it just
    27        being passed off as a four month interlude under one
    28        manager.  I understand that.  All I am suggesting is that,
    29        having made your point about it, I suggest it does not bear
    30        too much going over.
    31
    32   MS. STEEL:  Right.  If I could just say, I mean, I worked out
    33        some figures for while Mr. Roberts was Manager, and maybe
    34        if I just give them?  From 3rd July 1994 to 16th July 1994
    35        there were 154 people on the payroll and 47 of them worked
    36        no hours.
    37
    38   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Just pause a moment.  Yes?
    39
    40   MS. STEEL:  From 17th July 94 to the 30th July 94 there are 141
    41        people on the payroll and 22 did no hours; from 31st July
    42        94 to 13th August 94 there are 135 people on the payroll
    43        and 26 did no hours; from 14th August 94 to 27th August 94,
    44        137 people on the payroll, 29 did no hours; from
    45        28th August 94 to 10th September 94, 127 people on the
    46        payroll, 26 did no hours; from 11th September to
    47        24th September 94, 118 on the payroll and 20 did no hours;
    48        from 25th September to 8th October 94, 124 on the payroll
    49        and 23 did no hours; from 9th October to 22nd October there
    50        are 132 on the payroll and 31 did no hours.  On average, 
    51        there were between 100 and 110 people who did some hours 
    52        over those pay periods.  That was understaffed, was it not? 
    53        A.  During that period?
    54
    55   Q.   Yes.
    56
    57   MR. RAMPTON:  It has to be said, my Lord, that I do not accept
    58        most of Ms. Steel's figures, on my own calculations.
    59
    60   MS. STEEL:   OK.  If those figures are correct, the store was
 
                                      41

PrevNextIndex