Day 214 - 01 02 96 - Page 48


 
 

                                                                  DAY 214
 
                                           DAVID ROBERTS, Cross-examined:
 
 
 
     1   MS. STEEL:   Perhaps if we all look at them again.  If I just
     2        say, I have done it for the period before, so I can give
     3        you the figure for that as well.
     4
     5   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What I would like you to do, just so that
     6        I can put it in the margin of my note, is give me the sheet
     7        number that you got your figures off.
     8
     9   MS. STEEL:   It will be three sheets, I think.  It starts on
    10        page 63, 64 and 65.
    11
    12   MR. RAMPTON:  I do not think there is any discrepancy for sheet
    13        65, which is the end of the period in which Mr. Roberts
    14        started.  I have 137 total number of names; I have 13 new
    15        starters from 25th June, which was when Mr. Roberts took
    16        over; and, in addition to that, I have whatever it is that
    17        makes up 32 in total of the zeros.  What I am saying rather
    18        badly is that of those 32 zeros, at least 13 are new
    19        starters under Mr. Roberts; and there are, in addition to
    20        that, I think, a number of new starters under -----
    21
    22   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I suggest it is left there, because my
    23        experience of litigation is that one can spend quite a bit
    24        of time during the evidence with these elegant
    25        calculations, and then, when one comes to speeches, a broad
    26        point turns out to have more power.  That is not to say
    27        that I will not consider the accurate figures.  All that is
    28        necessary, I think, for the moment is that Ms. Steel has
    29        given the page numbers and the figures she gets, and that
    30        can be checked over if it is thought fit.
    31
    32   MS. STEEL:  If I just say, because for the period before, the
    33        period before, the fortnight before, which starts on
    34        page 58, 5th June to 18th June, there are 118 people on the
    35        payroll, according to my calculations, of which 34 worked
    36        no hours; and I have actually checked that 17 of these did
    37        work again at a later date, so they were not people who
    38        should have been taken off.  They all worked again within
    39        the next month or so.  But, in any event, there is -----
    40
    41   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Mr. Rampton's figures for the period before
    42        that were 118 and 33; and you said yesterday -- I think you
    43        agreed the 118, or were not in a position to challenge it.
    44        You have just mentioned 118, but you had 29 who were
    45        zeros.
    46
    47   MS. STEEL:  I had been doing it from the "net pay" column, the
    48        zeros there; and because Mr. Rampton said he actually did
    49        it from the hours, I went through again and did it from the
    50        actual hours worked as opposed to the "net pay" column. 
    51        Previously, I just counted up all the zeros in the "net 
    52        pay" column. 
    53
    54   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  If we are going to go into this degree of
    55        particulars, what I think I probably need at the end of the
    56        day is what figure you get and how you get it from the
    57        documents as to the numbers of people who do appear to have
    58        been doing any kind of significant amount of work at the
    59        time.
    60
 
                                      48

PrevNextIndex