Day 214 - 01 02 96 - Page 69
DAY 214
DAVID ROBERTS, Cross-examined:
1 Q. Right. I do not think I have any further questions.
2
3 MR. MORRIS: No further questions.
4
5 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Thank you.
6
7 Re-examined by MR. RAMPTON, Q.C.
8
9 Q. Only one thing Mr. Roberts, you told us in your
10 evidence-in-chief that, so far as you could work out, you
11 hired about 44 new people in the first month or so when you
12 took over. Then when you were cross-examined by Ms. Steel,
13 you accepted that even despite that for the early part of
14 your time as Manager you still felt you were somewhat
15 undercrewed or understaffed?
16 A. Yes.
17
18 Q. Can I ask you to look at the Heathrow file, please, at page
19 100? This is for the period 9th to 22nd October 94.
20 A. Yes.
21
22 Q. When you had been there for just over three months, yes,
23 and then look over the page at 101 -- I hope I have added
24 it up correctly -- I count in that long list of names 29
25 new starters, yes? Do you remember why at that period, the
26 beginning of October, the middle of October 1994, you took
27 on another 29 people?
28 A. Firstly, because I wanted to increase the numbers to
29 what the numbers set by Semir Khazna and, secondly, October
30 is a usually a good month for hiring because we have to
31 hire for December.
32
33 Q. Yes, so that is two reasons, because of Christmas?
34 A. Yes.
35
36 Q. I am just wondering whether during the period of the three
37 months or so that you had been there, you might also have
38 lost some people from the payroll?
39 A. The crew originally had zero hours on the -- when
40 I first took over, as I said, I did not know who they
41 were. I had never met them. We had to send out absence
42 letters and I had to find out who they were, and then they
43 would terminate it later on, but I could not replace them
44 straightaway if I thought they might be coming back. But
45 when I had time to actually go through and check out who
46 these people were or were not, then that is when I found
47 out the true situation that I was in.
48
49 Q. They were names but not workers?
50 A. There was people that had worked there previously but,
51 for some reason, they were somewhere else, or they may have
52 left, for whatever reason.
53
54 Q. But of the people who worked there, which vary between 130
55 and 105 or 101 during these first three months, were you
56 conscious of losing any significant number of those people?
57 A. Yes, I was. Yes, I did lose people from that.
58
59 Q. The actual workers?
60 A. Yes.
69


