Day 216 - 06 02 96 - Page 38
DAY 216
KEVIN HARRISON, Cross-examined:
1 Do customers suffer in any way?
2 A. No.
3
4 Q. Do crew suffer in any way?
5 A. No.
6
7 MR. RAMPTON: Yes. Thank you, Mr. Harrison.
8
9 Re-examined by the Defendants
10
11 MS. STEEL: Do you just want to explain what you consider the
12 relevance of that to be, the part about ringing in
13 and -----
14 A. I cannot really say any more, other than to stress
15 that, in my opinion, it is an example of the way things are
16 manipulated to make the paper figures more acceptable to
17 people in higher managerial positions, Area Supervisors and
18 such.
19
20 Q. Why do they do that?
21 A. To stop pressure on the Manager or the rest of the
22 management team in any given store to get it right.
23
24 Q. Right.
25 A. I mean, I am personally convinced that a lot of these
26 practices are known to go on by some more senior
27 management, but are ignored; or have been in the past,
28 certainly.
29
30 MS. STEEL: Can I just ask something, which is, I do not know,
31 it appeared that Mr. Rampton was trying to insinuate
32 something sinister about the fact that the witness had read
33 other people's statements since making his original
34 statement. I am not sure whether I need to deal with that,
35 given that the Plaintiffs' witnesses have all read each
36 other's statements and have generally said where they have
37 witnessed other things happened, and other people
38 have -----
39
40 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It is a matter for you whether you wish to
41 ask anything about it in re-examination.
42
43 MS. STEEL: Right. (To the witness) Perhaps if I just ask:
44 the things that are in the additional statement, are they
45 just things that were put in there just so that you could
46 go along with what other people were saying, or were they
47 things that you witnessed with your own eyes and were your
48 own experiences?
49 A. These are things that I witnessed with my own eyes and
50 my own experiences.
51
52 Q. Right.
53 A. They were definitely not put in to go along with what
54 other people had said.
55
56 Q. Thank you. You were asked about the fact that McDonald's
57 was a restaurant meant was it not logical that people could
58 not go on their breaks during busy periods. What would
59 have been the situation had more crew been scheduled to
60 work during Saturdays, for example?
38


