Day 216 - 06 02 96 - Page 39
DAY 216
KEVIN HARRISON, Re-examined:
1 A. I am not sure how practical that would have been
2 because, as I recall it, it was a case of the vast majority
3 of crew being present on a Saturday anyway; everyone that
4 was available to work was working.
5
6 Q. What about if the Company had taken on more staff?
7 A. That may have been a way around it. If they could have
8 done that to stagger the breaks, it would have been more
9 fair.
10
11 Q. You were asked about other places that you have worked.
12 How did your experiences and pay compare between McDonald's
13 and the Co-op?
14 A. I have never really worked in an environment where so
15 much has been expected from people and so much pressure has
16 been put on people to achieve the so-called results. From
17 a personal point of view, looking back on it, I cannot
18 believe that what I witnessed actually happened.
19 I sincerely hope it still does not.
20
21 Q. The pay rates, how did they compare between the Co-op and
22 McDonald's?
23 A. The Co-op was better paid, because overtime was paid.
24
25 Q. Incidentally, was there a union at the Co-op?
26 A. Yes.
27
28 MS. STEEL: Is there anything else that you felt had not been
29 dealt with?
30
31 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No. You have asked him the matters which he
32 has raised in the statement. I do not think you need to
33 ask that question. As you know, I am a bit wary about just
34 having open country on anything else that you want to put
35 in at this stage after 18 months of the trial.
36
37 MS. STEEL: I meant it in response to anything Mr. Rampton had
38 asked; that was all.
39
40 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I suggest you leave it there.
41
42 MS. STEEL: OK. No further questions.
43
44 MR. MORRIS: No further questions.
45
46 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Thank you, Mr. Harrison.
47
48 (The witness withdrew)
49
50 MS. STEEL: Just before we go off the subject of Mr. Harrison,
51 I just want to raise about the service of documents last
52 night. The letter that we got from the Plaintiffs said
53 that the reason for this was that it was a new allegation.
54 I have brought this up before. We are extremely unhappy at
55 what is going on, particularly in relation to the
56 Colchester store, where the Plaintiffs have continuously
57 said that they have got no documents in their possession
58 that are relevant to any of the issues; they have all been
59 destroyed, or whatever; and then, just at the last minute,
60 new documents are disclosed. In this case, the Plaintiffs
39


