Day 233 - 26 03 96 - Page 26


 
 

                                                                  DAY 233
 
                                                  HOWARD LYMAN, Examined:
 
 
 
     1        meet their contracts.  Ground beef in bulk or patty form is
     2        impossible to trace to the original carcass.  My experience
     3        has shown me that unless you have purchased the animal,
     4        slaughtered it and processed it yourself, the country of
     5        origin could be in doubt.
     6
     7        "During the E.Coli outbreak in the United States fast food
     8        hamburgers, even the government could not track the origin
     9        of all the meat that was used in the ground beef.  The
    10        industry is not geared to track all supplies, and a flat
    11        statement that no product was sourced in a specific country
    12        would be almost impossible to prove."
    13
    14        I just have a couple of questions.  You would verify what I
    15        have read out from your statement?
    16        A.  Yes.
    17
    18   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  That, again, is Jack-in-the-box, the -----
    19        A.  That is correct.
    20
    21   MR. MORRIS:  When you said that they would source product from
    22        wherever they could in order to meet their contracts, could
    23        you just explain, from your own experience, what actually
    24        happens in the industry, in reality?
    25        A.  What happens in the industry is that processors will
    26        have contracts, and the contracts will state fat content,
    27        size of patties, things like that.  When it is under
    28        production -- and remember that when you go into processing
    29        plants, most of the employees are not over educated, and
    30        many of them with fourth, fifth grade educations -- their
    31        job is basically to take product, put it into the grinders,
    32        grind it up and take out the product.  When they would get
    33        to a point that they were out of basic product to go into
    34        the grinders, they would be on the phone calling anybody
    35        that they could get the product from; and I saw that many
    36        processors covered each other in the industry, and it was
    37        not unusual for one to transfer meat back and forth to meet
    38        pressing contracts.  It was done all of the time.  Much of
    39        that product, it would have been impossible to determine
    40        where it came from.
    41
    42   Q.   If a process plant uses some imported beef but has a
    43        specification for another supplier not to use imported
    44        beef, have you any comment about that?
    45        A.  If a processor, in my opinion, is taking in imported
    46        product and they have contracts that call for the exclusion
    47        of imported products, knowing what I know about the labour
    48        practices within processing plants, I would believe that it
    49        would be impossible to guarantee that the type of employees
    50        that they would have would always have that product 
    51        segregated.  I would believe that that would be the 
    52        furthest stretch of imagination I could imagine. 
    53
    54   Q.   We have seen in this case -- and Mr. Rampton may indeed put
    55        it to you, I do not know -- that McDonald's specifications
    56        have included the phrase -- for their processing companies,
    57        of which they had over 150 before the mid 1980s and got
    58        that down to five by the mid 1980s -- they had a
    59        specification saying "no imported beef".  Have you got any
    60        comment on that?
 
                                      26

PrevNextIndex