Day 233 - 26 03 96 - Page 30
DAY 233
1
2 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Thank you, Mr. Lyman. Just leave the volume
3 there.
4
5 (The witness withdrew)
6
7 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Now, what are we going to do next?
8
9 MR. MORRIS: I do not know, actually.
10
11 MS. STEEL: I grabbed the papers I could a bit hastily on my
12 way here. They are not sorted out so, certainly before
13 lunch, I am not ready to go -----
14
15 MR. JUSTICE BELL: The things we have got to do, sooner rather
16 than later -- there is the question of your amended
17 defence, which I have not looked at but I will look at as
18 soon as we have a break. If there is anything which you
19 want to say with regard to the various discovery points in
20 addition to what Mr. Morris wants to say -- and my
21 recollection is that Mr. Morris had not replied to
22 Mr. Rampton in relation to the question of power, so far as
23 suppliers of patties are concerned, in Costa Rica,
24 Guatemala and Brazil -- because quite apart from any
25 question of whether I think it would be useful to have the
26 documents which you want, consisting of lists of farms and
27 maps of them, there is the question of whether I can
28 usefully order discovery if the documents are not in the
29 power of the First Plaintiff. We can forget the Second
30 Plaintiff for present purposes.
31
32 I gave a ruling on the principles which I would apply if
33 that question arose -- I think it was 27th February last
34 year. Obviously, I must stick to those principles. It is
35 just a question of whether you or Mr. Morris have an
36 argument in relation to the particular facts relating to
37 suppliers in Costa Rica, Guatemala and Brazil.
38
39 I cannot remember whether you were here, but Mr. Morris
40 will remember that Mr. Cesca, I think, was questioned about
41 some of the forms of specifications. But I actually do not
42 have any documentation -- correct me if I am wrong --
43 direct documentation in relation to the position of
44 suppliers in Costa Rica, Guatemala and Brazil. But however
45 that may be, you have a right to say anything you want
46 about that.
47
48 MS. STEEL: I was just going to say: is there any dispute that
49 they are joint ventures?
50
51 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No, there is not. But Mr. Rampton referred
52 to two cases, which I referred to in my ruling last year,
53 that even where a subsidiary is 100 per cent owned, that
54 does not mean that the company which owns it has power over
55 the documents in its subsidiary's possession. It surprised
56 me when I first read it, but that appears to be the law.
57
58 So Mr. Rampton says it does not matter that Braslo and,
59 what I will call for convenience, McDonald's of Costa Rica,
60 McDonald's of Guatemala -- although the companies actually
30


