Day 233 - 26 03 96 - Page 39
DAY 233
1 application to amend, he did not think that he would be
2 able to resist the application. So, I think that if you
3 feel that it is not an issue as presently stands, then
4 perhaps the best course is for us to draft an amendment and
5 to plead that particular issue; and then we would be
6 entitled from that to rely on any information which might
7 be available in terms of either interrogatories or
8 discovery relating to that, because they are the methods by
9 which -- well, they are included in the methods by which
10 you can prove your case.
11
12 MR. JUSTICE BELL: If I grant the discovery.
13
14 MS. STEEL: Yes, obviously.
15
16 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
17
18 MS. STEEL: OK. I was interrupting Mr. Morris at that point,
19 but I will carry on with the points that I wanted to make.
20
21 Can I just say, in respect of power, if by chance you felt
22 that the documents were not in their power because they
23 were in the possession of the suppliers, as a particular
24 example, I do remember Mr. Cesca saying, or it being in a
25 letter, that when they wanted to check out the location of
26 ranches, they would be given copies of the list so that
27 they could go and visit them.
28
29 Now, presumably, as soon as they get a copy of the list --
30 and, according to their evidence, they verify the location
31 on a frequent basis -- as soon as they get a copy of the
32 list, it is then in their possession and they have a duty
33 to disclose it.
34
35 Dave also reminds me that in Morganti's last statement, he
36 actually says he gave a list to Ray Cesca of all the
37 ranches, anyway. I do not know if you remember that.
38 I have not got the statement with me.
39
40 I mean, the point about the next time they are visiting
41 ranches, I dare say they can try and get round that by then
42 saying they are not going to visit ranches any more. But,
43 I do not know. I mean, it just strikes me that they do
44 regularly come into their possession and, therefore, they
45 should have actually been disclosed by now, because they
46 must have been in their possession within the last five
47 years, since the writs were first served on us, or at least
48 since the rainforest pleadings came into being, which was
49 several years ago.
50
51 I have a note on number 1: the lists of ranches or maps
52 charting the position of ranches supplying McDonald's
53 cattle in Costa Rica. I do not know whether that included
54 -- there was something about being compilations of various
55 years, and I do not know whether that was included under
56 that general heading.
57
58 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It was, because Mr. Cesca gave evidence of
59 lists of ranches, and they were annual -- I forget the term
60 he used now -- but there was a list by year, as
39


