Day 236 - 17 04 96 - Page 34


 
 

                                                                  Day 236
 
 
 
 
 
     1        statements speak of what he says he saw and of photographs
     2        and videos which he said he instructed be taken.  His
     3        evidence involves one or other, or both of the Defendants
     4        in those demonstrations, and appears to involve them in
     5        handing-out leaflets, and if his evidence "stands up" would
     6        appear to involve Ms. Steel in handing out the leaflet
     7        complained of, on 16th October 1989.
     8
     9        In respect of those matters, the Defendants, I am sure know
    10        exactly what their own individual cases are and I would
    11        have thought at the very shortest notice indeed, they could
    12        adequately cross-examine Mr. Carroll on those matters. I
    13        believe they can also cross-examine him without any
    14        prejudice to their case, on the documents which they are
    15        aware of.  If they discover further documents, or remind
    16        themselves of further documents in the future which they
    17        think it relevant to cross-examine Mr. Carroll on, then
    18        obviously I will consider any application that he be
    19        recalled for that purpose.  But at the moment, I cannot see
    20        any prejudice to the Defendants if Mr. Carroll is called,
    21        and then cross-examined immediately he has finished his
    22        evidence-in-chief, in relation to his observations, the
    23        photographs and the videos of the demonstrations, and in
    24        relation to those documents which the Defendants have in
    25        mind.  I think they should be perfectly able to do that,
    26        without any injustice to their case, with barely no notice
    27        at all.
    28
    29        What I am prepared to do is give Ms. Steel and Mr. Morris
    30        the option of adjourning now and resuming at 10.30 in the
    31        morning, so Mr. Caroll's evidence-in-chief, including
    32        production of the still photographs and viewing in court of
    33        the video films to which he refers, and cross-examination
    34        to follow immediately upon the end of his
    35        evidence-in-chief.  Or starting that evidence at 2
    36        o'clock.  I think the calm approach is taking the
    37        cross-examination of a witness can go ahead, as I have
    38        indicated, but I am prepared to put the starting of his
    39        evidence over until 10.30 in the morning, if either
    40        Defendant asks that that be done.
    41
    42        In the light of what I have been told about Mr. Carroll's
    43        family concern, I will not sit beyond 1 p.m. on Friday.
    44        I will only say this, that it has been suggested that
    45        nothing much would be lost if we did not sit for a day, a
    46        day-and-a-half or two days this week.  I am not prepared to
    47        accept any such argument, whichever party puts that
    48        forward, long though this case has lasted.  Every day court
    49        time is important.
    50 
    51        What do you want to do? I should say I do not think it is 
    52        necessary, for the cross-examination I have spoken of, to 
    53        examine documents at Barlow Lyde & Gilberts premises and
    54        I repeat what I have said.  That if on the future
    55        examination of those documents, there is good reason to
    56        recall Mr. Carroll, then I will consider that.
    57
    58   MS. STEEL:  Can I just ask, through the court, is Mr. Carroll's
    59        original statement in court with its appendices?  I did ask
    60        for it to be brought to court.
 
                                      34

PrevNextIndex