- McLibel -

exploitation of third world children

Posted by: Belinda Hind ( UK ) on June 24, 1997 at 11:11:25:

In Reply to: Re: McLibel 2 winners in USA posted by Paul Nicholls on June 23, 1997 at 15:46:26:

> You talk about explotation? Why not channel your energies into the
> terrible time children are having in Uganda, Pakistan, Brazil and
> many others working for pennies foraging for food and having to fend
> for other very young children often having no home.

Third world problems are very often caused by economic and political influence from our own countries - often as a result of our own purchases or the overseas policies of or elected governments or unelected multinationals.

> Do I care? Yes,as a matter of fact I do. Rather than spout off on the
> internet about it I give money to help - do you?

Give money? Oh that will help alot to change things... bet it make you feel righteous thought. While LIve Aid was raising millions for Ethiopia, the EU was importing grain from Ethiopia to feed to cattle. So you gave money I suppose - I stopped eating beef and started to inform people about the links between third world hunger and the actions of multinationals, what we eat, amd the IMF and the world bank.

> Exploitation of kids here in the Western world is rather different.If
> my kids pester me for a 2.00 gimmick with BigMac then OK, if I feel
> pressurized (and I don't) I'll say "no".

That's brave of you. And who says no to you when you mindlessly act on the influence of commercial advertising? Mny children simply can not understand the difference between a commercial and a cartoon or reality, they are gulliable and easily influenced. That inocence is cynicaly exploited by advertisers. That fact that adults can say no and control the purse strings does not change that fact.

> I don't know if you're a young man or have children, but, when my
> kids moan and groan for a pair of 80.00 trainers I see exploitation
> in action. I can guarantee that you will have a T-shirt, trainers,
> bag or whatever with a branded name.

Personally I do not - but I don't see how that is relevent.

> And you argue about a Big Mac?

Something wrong with that? There are many serious issues at stake. You have concern about children in poverty then you might be concerned about the children who make the stupid plastic 'happy meal' toys for McDonald's suppliers.

> Get real.

Get educated.




Follow Ups:

The Debating Room Post a Followup