Day 024 - 15 Sep 94 - Page 14
1 truth about the nutrition and ingredient information of
2 those products in a way that was most readily available to
3 the consumers, to see it as they ate it. But that was
4 merely conjecture on our part. What we heard from the
5 companies was that it was logistically very difficult, if
6 not impossible, for them to do that.
7
8 In general, that is all I can recall about what they told
9 us.
10
11 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Give me an example -- take some item of
12 McDonald's food, say, a regular hamburger or something
13 like that. Tell me what sort of information would be
14 ingredient information and what sort of information would
15 be nutritional information, according to the terms which
16 you are using?
17 A. The ingredients of a regular hamburger, I think, would
18 be the buns, the bread and the content of the bread. They
19 would have to disclose what went into making the bread;
20 the hamburger, the meat, any additives to that meat,
21 although I do not believe there were any.
22
23 Q. They could just say "pure beef" or "beef" in relation to
24 that?
25 A. I believe so; both the way that bread is broken down
26 and specifically the way that meat is to be disclosed are
27 governed by federal regulations of two different
28 agencies. The Food and Drug Administration governs
29 disclosure of the bread product and for an unknown
30 division of responsibilities the United States Department
31 of Agriculture governs disclosure.
32
33 Q. Leave that. Nutritional information, on the other hand?
34 A. Nutritional information would be sodium, fat,
35 saturated fat, cholesterol, carbohydrates, information as
36 to the nutritional content of the product, not what went
37 into making up the product, which is the ingredients, the
38 pickles, the ketchup, whatever. But when you take that
39 entire product and analyse it, I do not know, I suspect
40 they put it in some kind of a fancy blender and stir it
41 up, then analyse what is in that overall. That is the
42 nutritional information.
43
44 MS. STEEL: The general position that you have said of the
45 companies, was that true for McDonald's as well?
46 A. I do not recall anybody having a different position.
47 I, unfortunately, no longer have access to the notes
48 I made from that meeting, nor can the Texas Attorney
49 General office locate those notes. So, I am having to go
50 on my memory from those meetings.
51
52 As I said, McDonald's was not under the spotlight here.
53 It was a series of meetings to deal with the positions
54 taken and concerns of a series of companies at that time.
55 We, therefore, were considering pretty much everything the
56 company said as going into the mix of what the industry
57 believed. That was the purpose of the meetings, not to
58 learn what would McDonald's do but what would the industry
59 do.
60
