Day 111 - 30 Mar 95 - Page 18
1 court from time to time?
2 A. Yes, I have been here once when Mr. Bennett appeared.
3
4 Q. You have not read the transcripts apart from that?
5 A. No. I have read the transcripts from Mr. Bennett's
6 evidence.
7
8 Q. You have?
9 A. Yes, that is the only one.
10
11 Q. But not Professor Jackson, for instance?
12 A. No.
13
14 MR. MORRIS: Just very briefly, to finish off this area, it will
15 probably come up when we look at the floor plan, but -----
16
17 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I will rise for five minutes now. What
18 I suggest is you have had Ms. Hovi give an outline of what
19 the general risks are from her aspect. We have had quite a
20 lot of evidence about it already. What I suggest is you go
21 on now to adduce such evidence as she is able to give of
22 the practices or non-practices which she says prevail at
23 Jarretts which would give rise to a risk of contamination
24 or contamination which was not dealt with and so on.
25
26 We will have the five-minute break now to give you a moment
27 to think about it.
28
29 (Short Adjournment)
30
31 MR. MORRIS: To save time, we thought it might be helpful to ask
32 Mr. Rampton to identify what common grounds he thinks there
33 is, because that would be very helpful.
34
35 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I will let Mr. Rampton say anything he wishes
36 to do so before I make any comment.
37
38 MR. RAMPTON: I would much rather your Lordship answered that
39 query. I am not sure I am in a position to say anything on
40 common ground yet.
41
42 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What I have in mind is this, as a general
43 statement, it is common ground that the guts of animals
44 which come into slaughterhouses contain various pathogens
45 which, if they escape from the gut of the animal on to the
46 dehided carcass of, for instance, a steer, the carcass of a
47 pig, or the carcass of a chicken, and go undetected and
48 undealt with, may lead to food poisoning in humans.
49
50 That may be food poisoning properly so-called where the
51 organism is allowed to multiply to a dangerous level, or it
52 may be food-borne disease where the pathogen is one which
53 is or may be pathogenic in its original quantities without
54 having to multiply between, say, the point of slaughter and
55 the point of ingestion.
56
57 We have had a deal of evidence about different pathogens
58 and we have had a deal of evidence about testing whether
59 for total colony counts of bacteria which, dare I say, most
60 of which are probably spoilage bacteria rather than
