Day 249 - 14 May 96 - Page 44
1
2 Q. What work were they doing for you?
3 A. Quite a lot. They reported back to me on Transnational
4 Information Centre Limited, you know, an organisation
5 unconnected with London Greenpeace.
6
7 Q. What other work were they doing for you?
8
9 MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, I am not at all sure that is a proper
10 question.
11
12 MS. STEEL: All right, I will rephrase it.
13
14 MR. RAMPTON: It may have a point which relates to this case,
15 but I rather doubt it.
16
17 MS. STEEL: I will rephrase it. What work were they doing for
18 you that caused them to send you information about
19 London Greenpeace?
20 A. They attended a meeting held by Transnational
21 Information Exchange, which is the parent organisation of
22 Transnational Information Centre Limited. This meeting was
23 to do with the cocoa industry, as far as I can remember.
24
25 Q. The what?
26 A. The cocoa industry. So, they obviously were not
27 attending on our behalf at that time, but at that meeting
28 literature of yours was distributed -- sorry, not yours, of
29 London Greenpeace was distributed.
30
31 Q. Which literature?
32 A. The pamphlet. I believe it was the pamphlet complained
33 of, so it would be around 1987.
34
35 Q. Why did they contact you about this?
36 A. Because we were mentioned and we were one of their
37 clients.
38
39 Q. You were already one of their clients at that time?
40 A. We had been one of their clients for some years.
41
42 Q. Right. They also provide information on workers, do they
43 not, and employment matters?
44 A. I am not sure. I do not think I have ever received any
45 information from them on that kind of thing. Union
46 activities they may have reported on; you know, big union
47 activities when unions were planning strikes and things
48 like that.
49
50 Q. They might have reported that to you?
51 A. Well, I would not have been all that interested in that
52 work. I would not have asked them to report that to me.
53
54 Q. That is their field though, is it not?
55
56 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Could we just pause a moment? I understand
57 why you ask what steps were taken at various stages in
58 order to find out partly when there were periods when no
59 steps were being taken, and in so far as there might have
60 been inquiries of some other organisation to get
