- Capitalism and Alternatives -

Proletarians: stealing from the capitalists

Posted by: Joel Jacobson ( Master of the Universe, USA ) on February 10, 1999 at 12:10:49:

I want to start by saying that there are two parts to this post. The first is parody, and the second seeks to get the debate back to where the whole issue really lies.

Joe is a proletarian as he does not own any of the means of production. So, he goes to work for a capitalist who pays him $10 per hour. If he were to work without this individual's capital he would only produce goods priced at $2 per hour. Thus, Joe steals $8 for every hour he works for the capitalist. Further, he extracts this $8 by threatening to not show up for work. This is called blackmail or coercion. If Joe does not work then the capitalist might be forced to work. Joe's physical/material action (for Nikhil: this is definitely subject to the Second Law of Thermodynamics) was the causal action that forced the capitalist to labor using his own means of production.

Do I believe the above version? Absolutely not. Implicit in the above is the assumption that value has any relation whatsoever to price. Value in an overall sense relates solely to pure metaphysical conjectures and, while academically interesting, has no basis for any sort of social science. Value is pure metaphysical speculation.

The real issue here is the method by which society allocates the means of production. So, let's get off this trippy metaphysical 'value' bullshit and analyze the pros and cons of different methods of such allocation. This point, really, was the whole reason Marx advocated an objective value system based upon the price brought by workers for their labor.

Any takers on giving me a reason why the means of production should be publicly owned without resorting to some ethereal metaphysical ramblings?


Follow Ups:

The Debating Room Post a Followup